Skip to content
HeightComparison3D
Menu

Height Converter

Convert height between cm, meters, feet and inches as you type. Enter a value in any box and the others update instantly with exact results.

By Kashif Nazir KhanLast reviewed

Feet + inches
175 cm = 5′8.9″ = 68.9 inches = 1.75 m

See 175 cm visualized next to average heights →

Height conversion formulas

  • cm → inches: cm ÷ 2.54
  • inches → feet + inches: feet = floor(inches ÷ 12), remaining inches = inches − feet × 12
  • feet + inches → cm: (feet × 12 + inches) × 2.54
  • m → cm: m × 100

The inch is defined as exactly 25.4 mm, so every conversion on this page is exact before rounding. Need to compare two heights rather than convert one? Use the height difference calculator or the 3D height comparison tool.

Height conversion chart: 120–220 cm

Every centimeter from 120 to 220 with its feet-and-inches equivalent. Linked heights open a page that shows them next to average men and women.

cmFeet & inchesInchesMeters
120 cm3′11.2″47.241.20 m
121 cm3′11.6″47.641.21 m
122 cm4′0″48.031.22 m
123 cm4′0.4″48.431.23 m
124 cm4′0.8″48.821.24 m
125 cm4′1.2″49.211.25 m
126 cm4′1.6″49.611.26 m
127 cm4′2″501.27 m
128 cm4′2.4″50.391.28 m
129 cm4′2.8″50.791.29 m
130 cm4′3.2″51.181.30 m
131 cm4′3.6″51.571.31 m
132 cm4′4″51.971.32 m
133 cm4′4.4″52.361.33 m
134 cm4′4.8″52.761.34 m
135 cm4′5.1″53.151.35 m
136 cm4′5.5″53.541.36 m
137 cm4′5.9″53.941.37 m
138 cm4′6.3″54.331.38 m
139 cm4′6.7″54.721.39 m
140 cm4′7.1″55.121.40 m
141 cm4′7.5″55.511.41 m
142 cm4′7.9″55.911.42 m
143 cm4′8.3″56.31.43 m
144 cm4′8.7″56.691.44 m
145 cm4′9.1″57.091.45 m
146 cm4′9.5″57.481.46 m
147 cm4′9.9″57.871.47 m
148 cm4′10.3″58.271.48 m
149 cm4′10.7″58.661.49 m
150 cm4′11.1″59.061.50 m
151 cm4′11.4″59.451.51 m
152 cm4′11.8″59.841.52 m
153 cm5′0.2″60.241.53 m
154 cm5′0.6″60.631.54 m
155 cm5′1″61.021.55 m
156 cm5′1.4″61.421.56 m
157 cm5′1.8″61.811.57 m
158 cm5′2.2″62.21.58 m
159 cm5′2.6″62.61.59 m
160 cm5′3″62.991.60 m
161 cm5′3.4″63.391.61 m
162 cm5′3.8″63.781.62 m
163 cm5′4.2″64.171.63 m
164 cm5′4.6″64.571.64 m
165 cm5′5″64.961.65 m
166 cm5′5.4″65.351.66 m
167 cm5′5.7″65.751.67 m
168 cm5′6.1″66.141.68 m
169 cm5′6.5″66.541.69 m
170 cm5′6.9″66.931.70 m
171 cm5′7.3″67.321.71 m
172 cm5′7.7″67.721.72 m
173 cm5′8.1″68.111.73 m
174 cm5′8.5″68.51.74 m
175 cm5′8.9″68.91.75 m
176 cm5′9.3″69.291.76 m
177 cm5′9.7″69.691.77 m
178 cm5′10.1″70.081.78 m
179 cm5′10.5″70.471.79 m
180 cm5′10.9″70.871.80 m
181 cm5′11.3″71.261.81 m
182 cm5′11.7″71.651.82 m
183 cm6′0″72.051.83 m
184 cm6′0.4″72.441.84 m
185 cm6′0.8″72.831.85 m
186 cm6′1.2″73.231.86 m
187 cm6′1.6″73.621.87 m
188 cm6′2″74.021.88 m
189 cm6′2.4″74.411.89 m
190 cm6′2.8″74.81.90 m
191 cm6′3.2″75.21.91 m
192 cm6′3.6″75.591.92 m
193 cm6′4″75.981.93 m
194 cm6′4.4″76.381.94 m
195 cm6′4.8″76.771.95 m
196 cm6′5.2″77.171.96 m
197 cm6′5.6″77.561.97 m
198 cm6′6″77.951.98 m
199 cm6′6.3″78.351.99 m
200 cm6′6.7″78.742.00 m
201 cm6′7.1″79.132.01 m
202 cm6′7.5″79.532.02 m
203 cm6′7.9″79.922.03 m
204 cm6′8.3″80.312.04 m
205 cm6′8.7″80.712.05 m
206 cm6′9.1″81.12.06 m
207 cm6′9.5″81.52.07 m
208 cm6′9.9″81.892.08 m
209 cm6′10.3″82.282.09 m
210 cm6′10.7″82.682.10 m
211 cm6′11.1″83.072.11 m
212 cm6′11.5″83.462.12 m
213 cm6′11.9″83.862.13 m
214 cm7′0.3″84.252.14 m
215 cm7′0.6″84.652.15 m
216 cm7′1″85.042.16 m
217 cm7′1.4″85.432.17 m
218 cm7′1.8″85.832.18 m
219 cm7′2.2″86.222.19 m
220 cm7′2.6″86.612.20 m

Popular heights: feet and inches to cm

A converter built on an exact number

Every height conversion on this page rests on a single fact: one inch is exactly 2.54 centimeters. It is not an approximation that happens to be close. It is a legal definition, and it means that converting between metric and imperial heights never loses accuracy until you choose to round.

The definition is younger than many people realize. NIST records that in 1958 a conference of English-speaking nations agreed to unify their standards of length and mass in metric terms. Before that, the American yard and the British imperial yard differed slightly. The compromise shortened the American yard and lengthened the imperial one so both equal exactly 0.9144 meters. The United States announced the new values in Federal Register Notice 59-5442 on June 30, 1959, effective the next day. Divide 0.9144 m by the 36 inches in a yard and you get 0.0254 m, or 25.4 mm, per inch.

One leftover from the old system lasted surprisingly long. The US survey foot, defined as 1200/3937 of a meter (about 0.3048006 m), was kept for land surveying. It differs from the international foot by roughly two parts per million, irrelevant for a person's height but significant over hundreds of miles of map. NIST retired it for all uses after December 31, 2022.

Why Americans still say "five foot nine"

Feet and inches have been defined by the meter in the United States far longer than most people assume. The Metric Act of 1866 made metric units legal in trade, the US was one of the original signatories of the 1875 Treaty of the Metre, and the Mendenhall Order of 1893 adopted the international metric prototypes as the country's fundamental standards of length and mass. Since then, the yard, foot and inch have officially been fractions of a meter, with the 1959 agreement simply tidying the exact ratio.

Everyday usage never followed. The Metric Conversion Act of 1975 set up a voluntary changeover and a US Metric Board, which was disbanded in 1982, and a 1988 trade law named metric the preferred system for trade and commerce without requiring it elsewhere. The result is a split that shows up whenever height is discussed. American doctors usually talk to patients in feet and inches, while clinics often record height in centimeters, and body mass index is always expressed in kilograms per square meter even when it is calculated from pounds and inches. The UK, Canada and Ireland show a similar mix, with official forms and health records largely metric and conversation often imperial. That is exactly the gap a height converter fills.

The formulas the converter uses

The tool keeps one value internally, height in centimeters, and derives everything else from it. That way every box on the screen always agrees with every other box.

Conversion Formula Example
cm to inches cm ÷ 2.54 170 cm → 66.93 in
inches to feet and inches feet = whole part of (in ÷ 12); inches = remainder 66.93 in → 5 ft 6.93 in
feet and inches to cm (feet × 12 + inches) × 2.54 5 ft 9 in → 175.26 cm
cm to decimal feet cm ÷ 30.48 175 cm → 5.741 ft
meters to cm m × 100 1.75 m → 175 cm

A foot is 12 × 2.54 = 30.48 cm exactly, which is where the decimal-feet shortcut comes from. Decimal feet are rarely used for human height, but they appear in some engineering and medical records, so the distinction matters, as the section on notation below explains.

Handling the edge where inches round up to 12

A subtle bug affects many simple converters. Take 182.8 cm. That is 71.97 inches, or 5 feet and 11.97 inches. Rounded to the nearest whole inch, the remainder becomes 12, and a careless converter prints the impossible 5′12″. This site's conversion code carries that extra 12 inches into the feet column, so 182.8 cm displays correctly as 6′0″. The same carry applies when rounding to one decimal place.

Reading a free-typed height

The "type any height" box accepts the formats people actually use, and it interprets them with a few explicit rules:

  • Feet and inches with symbols or words: 5′11″, 5'11, 5 ft 11 in, 5 feet 11 and 5 11 all mean 5 feet 11 inches.
  • Units at the end: 180 cm, 1.8 m, 1800 mm and 71 in are read in the unit given.
  • Bare numbers: below 3 is treated as meters (1.75), from 3 to just under 9 as feet, and anything larger as centimeters (175).
  • The "5.11" convention: a bare number such as 5.11 or 5.9 is read as feet and inches, 5′11″ or 5′9″, because that is overwhelmingly what people mean when they type it. Only when the part after the decimal point exceeds 11, as in 5.75, is it treated as decimal feet.

That last rule deserves a warning, because decimal feet and feet-plus-inches look alike but differ. Five and a half feet is 5′6″ (167.64 cm). Five feet five inches is 165.1 cm. If you really mean decimal feet, add the unit: typing 5.5 ft returns 167.64 cm, while 5.5 alone returns 165.1 cm.

Worked examples at familiar heights

Height Exact inches Feet and inches (1 dp) Usually stated as
152 cm 59.84 4′11.8″ 5′0″
160 cm 62.99 5′3.0″ 5′3″
165 cm 64.96 5′5.0″ 5′5″
170 cm 66.93 5′6.9″ 5′7″
175 cm 68.90 5′8.9″ 5′9″
177 cm 69.69 5′9.7″ 5′10″
180 cm 70.87 5′10.9″ 5′11″
183 cm 72.05 6′0.0″ 6′0″
190 cm 74.80 6′2.8″ 6′3″
200 cm 78.74 6′6.7″ 6′7″

Going the other way, a few exact values are worth remembering: 5′0″ is 152.4 cm, 5′4″ is 162.56 cm, 5′7″ is 170.18 cm, 5′10″ is 177.8 cm, 6′0″ is 182.88 cm and 7′0″ is 213.36 cm. The cm-to-feet and feet-to-cm charts list every value in between, and individual pages such as 180 cm in feet and 5′10″ in cm show the arithmetic and place the height next to average adults.

Mental shortcuts and where they go wrong

When no converter is at hand, people reach for round numbers. The two most popular shortcuts are "divide centimeters by 2.5 to get inches" and "30 centimeters is a foot." They are convenient, and they are both the same approximation, because 2.5 × 12 = 30. The trouble is that both overstate height by about 1.6%, which at adult heights is roughly an inch.

Height Exact ÷ 2.5 shortcut Error
150 cm 4′11.1″ 5′0″ +0.9 in
165 cm 5′5.0″ 5′6″ +1.0 in
180 cm 5′10.9″ 6′0″ +1.1 in
195 cm 6′4.8″ 6′6″ +1.2 in

An inch is precisely the kind of difference people care about when comparing heights, so the shortcut is fine for estimating the size of a bookshelf and poor for stating a person's height. A better mental method starts from a known anchor: 5′0″ is 152.4 cm, and every additional inch adds 2.54 cm. Ten inches therefore add 25.4 cm, so 5′10″ is 152.4 + 25.4 = 177.8 cm. Going the other way, 6′0″ is 182.88 cm, and each centimeter is about 0.39 inches. With those two anchors and a little arithmetic you can stay within a few millimeters.

Other common slips

  • Rounding before converting. Rounding 175.26 cm to 175 cm and converting back gives 5′8.9″, not 5′9″. Convert the most precise value you have and round once, at the end.
  • Writing inches without feet. "68 inches" is 5′8″ (172.72 cm), not 6′8″. When in doubt, the "total inches" box shows the plain inch value.
  • Mixing up meters and centimeters. Typing 1.75 into a centimeter field produces a height of under 2 cm. The free-text box avoids this by reading small bare numbers as meters.
  • Treating 5.11 as a decimal. In decimal feet, 5.11 is 155.8 cm; in everyday writing it means 5′11″, or 180.3 cm, a difference of almost 25 cm. The converter assumes the everyday meaning unless you add "ft."

Why the same height can be written two ways

Rounding is the most common reason two sources disagree about the same person's height. A height of 177 cm is 5′9.69″. Truncate it and you get 5′9″; round it and you get 5′10″. Both are "correct" depending on the convention, and they differ by an inch. This matters most for heights that sit near a half-inch boundary, which is why this converter always shows one decimal place before you decide how to round.

There is also a well-documented human tendency to round up. A 2024 systematic review in the journal Nutrients found that self-reported and measured heights generally agree well, but that men tend to overreport their height. A 2018 meta-analysis of 21 studies covering 18,749 women of reproductive age found self-reported height averaged 0.36 cm more than measured height. The effect is small on average but helps explain why so many people describe themselves as exactly 6 feet. When a conversion matters, for a medical form or a uniform, convert a measured value rather than a remembered one.

Your height is not a fixed number

Precise conversion makes it tempting to quote a height to two decimal places, but bodies are less precise than arithmetic. Spinal discs compress under load during the day and recover overnight. A study in Clinical Biomechanics that measured adults 24 times over a full day found a trough-to-peak change in stature of about 1.8 cm, with the largest drop in the first hour after getting up. A study of schoolchildren in Archives of Disease in Childhood found most of the daily loss occurred during the morning, with little change after about six hours awake.

So a person who measures 175.3 cm on rising may measure about 173.5 cm by evening, roughly 5′9″ versus 5′8.3″. Converting either value is exact; choosing which value represents "your height" is the real decision. Measuring at a consistent time, ideally in the morning, gives the most comparable results.

How to measure your height for an accurate conversion

  1. Remove shoes and anything on top of your head, and stand on a hard floor rather than carpet.
  2. Stand with heels together and heels, buttocks, shoulder blades and the back of your head against a flat wall.
  3. Look straight ahead so the line from the ear opening to the lower edge of the eye socket is level.
  4. Have someone place a flat object, such as a hardcover book, level on the crown of your head and mark the wall beneath it.
  5. Measure from the floor to the mark with a rigid tape, then enter the result in whichever unit your tape uses.

Measure two or three times and use the average. A tape that sags or a book that tilts can easily add a centimeter of error, more than any conversion ever will.

What the numbers mean once converted

A converted height is more useful with context. The CDC's NHANES survey for August 2021 to August 2023 measured US adults aged 20 and over at an average of 175.1 cm (about 5′9″) for men and 161.2 cm (about 5′3½″) for women. Converting your own height and comparing it with those figures is a quick way to see whether you are above or below the national average, and the height percentile calculator turns the same comparison into an exact rank.

If you want to compare two heights rather than convert one, the height difference calculator gives the gap in centimeters, inches and percent. To see a converted height standing next to celebrities, fictional characters or friends, enter it in the 3D height comparison tool. For national averages in both units, see average height by country.

When to use a chart instead

The live converter is quickest for a single value. The full charts are better when you need to scan a range, for example to see every metric height that rounds to 5′7″, or to choose a size band. The cm to feet chart covers every centimeter from 120 to 230 cm, and the feet to cm chart covers every inch from 4′0″ to 7′6″. Both use exactly the same formulas as the converter, so the numbers always match.

Frequently asked questions

What does the converter do if I type just a number like 6 or 175?

It guesses the unit from the size of the number. Values below 3 are read as meters, values from 3 to just under 9 as feet, and anything larger as centimeters. So 1.8 becomes 180 cm, 6 becomes 6 feet (182.88 cm) and 175 becomes 175 cm.

If I type 5.5, does the converter read five and a half feet?

No. Because most people write 5.5 to mean 5 feet 5 inches, a bare 5.5 is read as 5′5″ (165.1 cm), and 5.11 as 5′11″. A decimal part larger than 11, such as 5.75, is read as decimal feet. To force decimal feet, type 5.5 ft, which gives 167.64 cm.

Why does the converter show inches with one decimal place?

One decimal place makes rounding visible. 177 cm is 5′9.7″, which most people would round to 5′10″, while 175 cm is 5′8.9″. Showing the decimal stops a height from silently jumping by almost an inch.

Is the British foot the same as the American foot?

Yes, since July 1, 1959. Before then the US and imperial yards differed by a few parts per million. A 1958 agreement among English-speaking nations defined the yard as 0.9144 m, making both inches exactly 25.4 mm. The old US survey foot was retired for all uses after December 31, 2022.

How many significant figures should I quote for a height?

Usually the nearest centimeter or the nearest half inch. A person's height changes by more than a centimeter between morning and evening, so quoting 175.26 cm implies far more precision than any single measurement really has.

How do I convert my height for a form that wants meters?

Divide centimeters by 100. 175 cm is 1.75 m. If you start from feet and inches, convert to centimeters first, for example 5′9″ is 175.26 cm, then divide by 100 to get about 1.75 m.

How do I convert cm to feet and inches?

Divide the centimeters by 2.54 to get total inches, then divide by 12. The whole number is feet and the remainder is inches. For example 170 cm / 2.54 = 66.93 in; 66.93 / 12 = 5 feet with 6.93 inches left over, so 170 cm is about 5 ft 7 in.

How do I convert feet and inches to cm?

Multiply the feet by 12, add the inches, then multiply by 2.54. For example 5 ft 9 in = 69 inches, and 69 × 2.54 = 175.26 cm.

Why is 1 inch exactly 2.54 cm?

Since the international yard and pound agreement of 1959 the inch has been defined as exactly 25.4 millimeters, so conversions between inches and centimeters are exact, not approximations.

How do I convert height in meters to feet?

Multiply meters by 100 to get centimeters, then use the cm to feet method. 1.75 m = 175 cm = 68.9 inches = 5 ft 8.9 in. A quick shortcut is meters × 3.281 for decimal feet.

What does 5.11 mean as a height?

People usually write 5.11 to mean 5 feet 11 inches (180.3 cm), not 5.11 decimal feet (155.8 cm). This converter reads values like 5.11 or 5.9 as feet and inches; use 5 ft or 5' notation if you want to be explicit.

Should I round heights up or down?

Standard rounding goes to the nearest whole unit. 179.5 cm is 70.67 inches, which rounds to 5 ft 11 in. Many people round up when stating their own height, so heights quoted in feet and inches are often a little generous.

How tall is 6 feet in cm?

6 feet is 72 inches, which is exactly 182.88 cm, or about 1.83 m.

Sources

  1. NIST Office of Weights and Measures – SI units: length (1 inch = 25.4 mm exactly) (accessed 2026-10-17)
  2. NIST — U.S. survey foot (deprecated after December 31, 2022)
  3. Wikipedia — Metrication in the United States (Metric Act 1866, Mendenhall Order 1893, Metric Conversion Act 1975)
  4. Fayyaz K et al. (2024) — Validity of measured vs. self-reported weight and height: a systematic review, Nutrients 16(11):1704
  5. Seijo M et al. (2018) — Comparison of self-reported and directly measured weight and height among women of reproductive age: systematic review and meta-analysis
  6. Healey EL et al. (2011) — Diurnal variation in stature, Clinical Biomechanics 26(4)
  7. Voss LD, Bailey BJ (1997) — Diurnal variation in stature: is stretching the answer? Archives of Disease in Childhood 77(4):319
  8. Fryar CD et al. — Anthropometric Reference Data for Children and Adults: United States, August 2021–August 2023, Vital Health Stat 3(50)